Bowman v. Monsanto: Post Argument Discussion, February 19

Show Details
Click here to unsubscribe       Having trouble viewing this e-mail? View it in your browser
Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
American University Washington College of Law
Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property
and
The Federal Circuit Bar Association
Present
Bowman v. Monsanto:
Post Argument Discussion
Tuesday, February 19, 2013 | 4:15pm-5:50pm
Room 602, American University Washington College of Law
For Live Webcast, Registration and More info: CLICK HERE
1.5 Credits Ethics CLE Available for In-Person Attendees

As part of the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property’s ongoing Supreme Court series, counsel for parties andamici will discuss intellectual property cases on the afternoon of oral argument, addressing the reaction of the Supreme Court at oral argument. The discussion is open to the public and available as a live and on-demand webcast.

On February 19, 2013, the Supreme Court will hear the Bowman v. Monsanto argument, addressing patent exhaustion regarding seeds sold for planting and other self-replicating technologies. The afternoon after the argument, PIJIP is hosting a panel discussion with counsel for parties and selected amici.

Participants:

Paul Wolfson – Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Counsel for Respondent – Monsanto Co.

Mark Walters – Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, Counsel for the Petitioner – Bowman

Seth Greenstein – Constantine Cannon LLP, Counsel for Amici Curiae Automotive Aftermarket Industry Ass’n, Automotive Parts Remanufacturers Ass’n. & International Imaging Technology Council Supporting Petitioner

Scott McBride – McAndrews Held & Malloy LTD, Counsel for Amici Curiae Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation et al. Supporting Respondent

Prof. Amanda Cohen Leiter – American University Washington College of Law

Prof. Jorge Contreras – American University Washington College of Law, Moderator

Reception to follow